Tezos
XTZ to USD
Project history
2012 to 2014 was a period when a lot of innovative designs were proposed for cryptocurrencies, seeking to improve on the original concept of Bitcoin. The insight of the founder of Tezos was that the process of incorporating innovation and upgrades into existing blockchains was technologically cumbersome, as well as contentious as far the governance of deciding on upgrades was concerned.
The core vision of Tezos, published in 2014, was the technology for a self-amending blockchain with streamlined features for decision making and governance. This would allow the quick and efficient implementation of future innovation into the code and keep Tezos secure and state of the art for the long run.
The core code was developed between 2015 and 2017, and further development was funded by an ICO in 2017. The ICO exceeded its fundraising target more than tenfold and was the largest ICO ever up to that point (and remains one of the largest ever).
Technology
The key innovation of Tezos was the on-chain governance and unique self-amending feature that allows the protocol to upgrade its own code once the change has been approved by token holders.
The Tezos protocol also incorporates a secure, high quality smart contract functionality, with its own elegant programming language.
The validation of transactions is based on the (then still novel) proof-of-stake concept, where validators are rewarded on the basis of the number of tokens they hold. Apart from its energy efficiency, the proof-of-stake approach also better aligns the incentives of token holders with the protocol.
There are several variations on the proof-of-stake algorithm. In Tezos’ case, all token holders can nominate validators, which Tezos calls “bakers”, and receive staking rewards without having to forfeit their tokens. The bakers need to place a bond which they lose if they behave maliciously.
Multiple upgrades have increased the network’s efficiency significantly.
Key people
The concept for the Tezos protocol was conceived by Arthur Breitman who was also the main architect of the code. He teamed up with his wife Kathleen who handled the strategic and business side of the project.
Their talent and passion for the project gathered strong backers early on, such as Tim Draper and Polychain Capital.
The record-breaking success of the ICO and the very large amount of funds raised (which multiplied further in the crypto bull market of 2017) might have been more of a curse than a blessing. The Tezos Foundation had control over the ICO funds, intended to support software development and ecosystem growth. After the ICO, the Foundation’s leadership behaved in a dysfunctional manner which caused delays to the project, angered token holders and invited lawsuits.
Previously remaining at arm’s length, Arthur Breitman joined the Foundation’s board earlier this year to help reinvigorate the project and move it past the difficult legacy.
Supply model and tokenomics
Tezos has an inflationary supply model, with 80 XTZ issued for each new block created. However, as all token holders are eligible for staking rewards, they are not disadvantaged by the increase in supply as they would be in the case of a proof-of-work protocol. The new supply of Tezos tokens is largely undiluted for token holders.
Tezos’ governance model of course allows both for changing the inflation rate and introducing a hard cap, although the latter is not likely as it goes against the philosophy of the founders and the community.
20 percent of the Tezos supply had been “pre-mined” and given to the Tezos Foundation and the founders in contracts vesting over 4 years.
Tezos also funds further protocol development with inflation, avoiding the need to do fundraising or to hamstring software development.
Key value drivers
Although Tezos made a lot of progress in 2021, it hasn’t convinced the market yet. Among the top ten protocol tokens in 2020, it has been overtaken by over a dozen other protocols since.
The opportunity for Tezos to rise in the rankings remains based on its well-constructed, well-conceived protocol. The question is whether Tezos will continue to capture NFT-related growth, and whether the significant investments made in visibility and their high-profile collaborations with large corporations and financial institutions will translate into gaining meaningful market share across several key application sectors such as DeFi and gaming.
Growth may be aided by the recently introduced feature (called “liquidity baking”) aimed at driving volume to the platform through an inbuilt DEX initially subsidised by the protocol (with the subsidy later recouped from trading fees).
Learn more about Sygnum’s secure, fully-integrated staking service and which tokens can be staked with this service here.
Disclaimer: The information in this publication pertaining to Sygnum Bank AG (“Sygnum”) is for general information purposes only, as per date of publication, and should not be considered exhaustive. This publication does not consider the financial situation of any natural or legal person, nor does it provide any tax, legal or investment advice. This publication does not constitute any advice or recommendation, an offer or invitation by or on behalf of Sygnum to purchase or sell any assets. No elements of precontractual or contractual relationship are intended. While the information is believed to be from accurate and reliable sources, Sygnum makes no representation or warranties, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy of the information. Sygnum expressly disclaims any and all liability that may be based on such information, omissions, or errors thereof. Any statements contained in this publication attributed to a third party represent Sygnum‘s interpretation of the data, information and/or opinions provided by that third party either publicly or through a subscription service, and such use and interpretation have not been reviewed by the third party. Sygnum reserves the right to amend or replace the information, in part or entirely, at any time, and without any obligation to notify the recipient of such amendment / replacement or to provide the recipient with access to the information. Simultaneously, there is no obligation of Sygnum to inform recipients of information, if before provided information later becomes outdated, inaccurate or obsolete, unless otherwise provided by applicable law. The information provided is not intended for use by or distributed to any individual or legal entity in any jurisdiction or country where such distribution, publication or use would be contrary to the law or regulatory provisions or in which Sygnum does not hold the necessary registration, approval authorisation or license. Except as otherwise provided by Sygnum, it is not allowed to modify, copy, distribute or reproduce, display, license, or otherwise use any content for commercial purposes.